This little newborn is old enough to be molested and sexually abused by an adult Muslim male. All accepted by ruling senior Imams who lay down the rules of Islamic laws.
Mufa’khathat – literally translated, it means “placing [penis] between the thighs” which means placing the male member between the thighs of a child.
The minimum recommend age for this noble Mohammedan practice is 3 months old although it is not strictly applied and can even be done on a newborn.
Mufa’khathat is connected to the practice of Mut’ah [sham sex marriages to conform with the Quran], discussed amongst others in Surat 65:4. Whether or not these practices have existed prior or only been added to the Quran in later years is irrelevant. What is relevant is to put a stop to it here and now. Clerics endorse them and they are therefore widely practiced today and sexually victimizes millions of small children in Muslim societies the world over.
And let us not forget: the West is officially endorsing it too and is equally responsible for child abuse in Muslim communities by allowing Islam to be freely practiced in the West. Islam needs to be banned so that honor murders, persecution of gays and minorities, incest and abuse can stop. Our contribution to this evil has to end.
Notes:
- Fatwa dealing with Mut’ah & Mufa’khathat by The Scientific Research and Religious Sanctions [Saudi Arabia] August 8, 2000.
- Senior Shi’ite Muslim cleric Ayatollah Khomeini’s interpretation of the Quran, and legal definition for incest, bestiality, sodomy, slavery, and jihad.
- English translation of Ayatollah Khomeini’s Green Book (PDF)
- Sunni clerics discuss the writings of Ayatollah Khomeini and his rape of a 4-year old girl
- Mufa’khathat and Mut’ah in Yemen: Child bride of 8, dies of internal injuries on first night of marriage
- Incest and Aiysha’s age in the Quran: Tabari VII:7; Surah At-Talaq 65:4; Tabari IX:128; Bukhari Vol5:58:236; Ayatu Allah Al Khumaini’s “Tahrir Al wasila” p. 241, issue number 12.
.
The following are excerpts from an interview with Bahraini women’s rights activist Ghada Jamshir, which aired on Al-Arabiya TV on December 21, 2005.
Interviewer: “What do you have against the Shari’a courts?”
Ghada Jamshir: “I have a lot against them. What they have done to Bahraini women is not a trivial matter. For years women have been going into these courts, only to be oppressed and treated unjustly. We have reached the point that we say: Enough. We have reached the breaking point.”
[…]
Interviewer (Turki Al-Dakhil): “Some people say that Ghada Jamshir is a Sunni, and that this is why she is leading the battle against [mut’ah] marriages, which are authorized by religious law among the Shi’ites.”
Ghada Jamshir: “Authorized by religious law?!”
Interviewer: “Among the Shiites, yes.”
Ghada Jamshir: “Does the Islamic Shari’a authorize mut’ah marriages? Does the Islamic Shari’a authorize mut’ah according to the following classification: ‘Pleasure from sexual contact with her thighs.’ They have: ‘Pleasure from sexual touching,’ ‘pleasure from sexual contact with her breasts.’ ‘Pleasure from a little girl.’ Do you know what ‘pleasure from a little girl’ means? It means that they derive sexual pleasure from a girl aged two, three, or four.”
Interviewer: “Let’s not go into details…”
Ghada Jamshir: “Let me tell you what ‘pleasure from sexual contact with her thighs’ means…”
Interviewer: “Don’t give me the details…”
Ghada Jamshir: “This is a violation of children’s rights! This constitutes sexual assault of the girl. What does ‘pleasure from sexual contact with her thighs’ mean? It means deriving sexual pleasure from an infant. How old is an infant? One year, a year and a half, a few months?
“Is it conceivable for a grown man to have sex with an infant girl? And you people tell me that the Islamic Shari’a authorizes this? Forget about the mut’ah. Let’s talk about misyar. What do misyar marriages mean? You said that I’m a Sunni and that’s why I’m attacking the Shiites. No!”
Interviewer: “Some people claim that.”
Ghada Jamshir: “No, no. What does the misyar marriage mean? A man marries a woman from another town, and goes to her once a month. He ‘visits’ her. He calls her his ‘wife.'”
Interviewer: “Not necessarily once a month. He might go there every day.”
Ghada Jamshir: “Brother Turki, this kind of marriage, this kind of behavior, diminishes the woman’s honor as a human being.”
[…]
Bahraini women’s rights activist Ghada Jamshir exposes Islamic law to Al-Arabiya TV host Turki Al-Dakhil while describing mut’ah (sham marriages Muslim adult males commit to justify incest of children and prostitution of women to fall within Islamic law) and the meaning of infant Mufa’khathat.
.
Iqra Productions in Sheffield, England, admit Prophet Mohammed committed mufa’khathat
Here’s a Muslim from Iqra Productions in Sheffield, England, is trying to make reason of mufa’khathat by blaming Christians (of course) for its exposure. Christians have nothing to do with exposing Islamic abuse of infants. The exposure comes from the modern world, from mass communication, from social media, videos and evidence of the testimony of Islamic law as presented by Muslim clerics – and from Arab television.
A talk on ‘Muhammad & Aisha A 7th Century Love (!) Story’ [puke, puke]. Islamic paedophilia openly sponsored by Aston University in Birmingham, England – Britanistan. The University describes itself: “Founded in 1895 and a University since 1966, Aston is a long established research-led University known for its world-class teaching quality and strong links to industry, government and commerce.” What a joke.
This same group writes on their blog, thefactsaboutislam.blogspot.com: “The early classical scholar, Hasan al-Basri (642 – 728 or 737 AD), has already made it known Islam does NOT allow Muslim men to approach prepubescent girls in a sexual fashion.”
Are Muslims followers of prophet Mohammed or of Hasan al-Basri (who appears to have been gay)? Prophet Mohammed’s life and conduct is very well documented in the Surah and the Hadith and reveals that he widely indulged in child sex, capturing of slaves, rape of women, theft, criminality, invasions, terrorism and he constantly violated the laws others had to follow.
As usual Muslims get their tongues twister whenever they try and justify the crimes of their prophet. They did the same regarding the incest committed against Aiysha, where her age was finally changed (they always change passages in the Quran) to nine. They start by denying Mohammed’s crimes. Mohammed’s criminal behavior is well documented in the Quran. Fact is Mohammed’s rubbing of genitalia on childbride Aishya originates from a far higher authority than a small group in England, namely the main board for Islamic sanctions in Mecca, Saudi Arabia.
In the video below the same representative for Iqra Productions says [3:05-3:16] “As for the prophet Mohammed and his fiance Aiysha she was six years of age and he could not have intercourse with her due to her small age. That is why the prophet, PBU, place is male member between her thighs and massaged it [his penis] softly [between the thighs of a six-year old child].”
Iqra Productions contradict Saudi authority from Mecca on the interpretation of the Quran. The Saudi religious authorities from the Fatwa linked under the notes (top of page) clearly verify that:
1) Mohammed was indeed a paedophile and married a child of six.
2) That the prophet of Islam committed incest on Aiysha 3 years earlier than the officially consummated age of 9.
3) That the prophet Mohammed indeed committed Mufa’khathat because she was ‘too young to be penetrated’ and used the child as a sex toy from when she was 6.
4) That Saudi authorities validate this behavior as normal and acceptable within Islamic law.
5) That while the Saudi government officially feigns to be ‘concerned about children’s rights’ to press and the international Human Rights organizations in reality they don’t consider sexual abuse of children (or women) a crime at all, but fully in accordance to Islamic law and therefore legal and permissible. They therefore have no intentions to end it.
Iqra Productions describe themselves as “a group of Muslims who aim to spread the teachings of Islam in its pristine form.” Mufa’khathat is here described in its pristine form.
He then describes how Saudis blame Muslim incest and paedophilia, which has existed for over 1,400 years, on the ‘kufar – Western culture’. So, prophet Mohammed was emulating Western culture? He had access to pornographic films 14 centuries ago and indulged in them? But his crimes are subject to arrest in the West while they are freely committed and legalized by Muslims across the Islamic world. That should say it all.
The Jinn and Tonic 
On this page there is a Muslim preacher talking about the permissibility of sex with minors in Islam. He goes on to justify it by quoting the talmud which sounded so nutty that I checked it out. Turns out that the talmud was talking about how to define virginity. The ruling was that if a female infant is the victim of sex abuse, she should still be defined as a virgin when she has grown up–that is, she is not at fault and should get the same dowry as any other girl who is a virgin.
btw: According to Islam, Jews and Christians corrupted God’s true message and Mohammed was sent to correct it.
Muslims always lie about the Jewish texts due to their racism against the Jews. They have even published completely invented versions of the Talmud. Now they have started to do the same with the Bible. They don’t understand that unlike Islam, other religions don’t alter and remove sections. It’s not done. All they can do is keep to the oldest text and try and interpret it but they don’t remove and add anything. Only in Islam do they remove old passages and add new passages.
Since the oldest sections of the Quran, whatever is left of it, has been acquired by looting, it still has historic significance. Mohammed was, no doubt, the most successful warlord and strategist in history no matter how cruel he was.
Sub-human, child raping, fucking animals. There really is nothing more I can say about this 😡