Guest Column: The False Religious Argument Over the Burqa

For two days, they burned cars. They shouted about racism and attacked police, hurling stones and shattering windows of the local police department. In Trappes, France, the riots that broke out last month over laws against wearing a niqab (or veil) in public threatened lives, disrupted the country, and raised, yet again, questions about conflicts between the culture of France’s secular democracy and much of its Muslim population. And though such riots take place frequently in France (in 2005, they ended only after the government was forced to impose a state of emergency), those conflicts – and the issues they represent – seem no closer to resolution.

This time, the trouble broke out after police, conducting a routine identity check, stopped a woman wearing niqab in Trappes, near Versailles, on July 18. When they asked her to remove the face-covering, her husband – a French-born convert to Islam – allegedly attempted to strangle one of the officers. He was immediately arrested, but the riots broke out soon after. By July 20, nearly 1,000 of Trappes’ 30,000 inhabitants had joined the violent clashes, which spread to nearby neighborhoods.

The events have reignited concern over a number of issues regarding the clashes between Muslim and non-Muslim communities that continue to plague France, which has the largest population of Muslims in Europe (numbering about 5 million). These same issues, in fact, have come to haunt all of Europe as its Muslim population grows, and, with it, the radicalization of European Muslim youth.

France banned the burqa and the niqab, both of which hide women’s faces, in 2010, imposing a fine on women who continue to wear the garments in public. (The law became active one year later.) Belgium and the Netherlands have since followed suit, and the idea is repeatedly broached in other European countries. Supporters of the policy claim that the burqa and niqab oppress women and violate Western mores; and that the inability to see a person’s face presents a security risk to the public. Opponents maintain that the garments represent a religious mandate, and that such bans constitute religious discrimination and infringe on the rights of Muslim women – though in truth, there is nothing in the Koran that mandates any such form of dress. Yet others argue more simply that the subject of wardrobe choice is not and should not land in the realm of the law.

In an ideal world, perhaps this last argument would be the case; but in fact, niqab-clad women – and men – have used the garment as a tool in committing crimes from robbery (including a string of five bank robberies in Pennsylvania) to kidnapping and worse, relying on the ease with which they can move about entirely anonymously within.

Moreover, with so-called “burqa bans” in place in a number of Muslim countries including Turkey and Tunisia, the law hardly, as many Western Muslims argue, represents a form of institutionalized “Islamophobia.” Indeed, barely more than 400 French Muslim women have been cited for violating the ban, indicating that several million of their French sisters have been unaffected in the practice of their religion.

Interestingly, too, most of those who have persisted in wearing the niqab are under age 30, according to Le Journal du Dimanche. That fact meshes with signs that many of Europe’s young Muslims are becoming more religiously conservative, often in rebellion against the Western traditions of the countries in which they live – and in most cases, were born and raised.

What’s more, Abdallah Zekri, president of L’observatoire de l’Islamophobie, a French Muslim rights organization, says that the majority of these women are converts. They “understand nothing about Islam or the Koran, who want to be more Muslim than Muslims.

In France, as elsewhere, it is both young, Western-born Muslims and Muslim converts who are the easier and more frequent targets for Al Qaeda recruiters, and for radical imams seeking to build Shariah-ruled communities in the West. The niqab fight is, in effect, simply a manifestation of this.

And that, argues the French state and other proponents of the ban, is quite the point: the niqab has nothing to do with religion, and everything to do with the politics of culture, in this case, that reflect a very real threat to the Enlightenment values of the West. As one American Muslim woman (who asked to remain anonymous given the sensitive nature of the subject) told me, “the niqab isn’t even an Islamic code of dress.”

“The Prophet’s wives did not dress like this,” said the woman, a Pakistani-American Muslim who divides her time between the two countries, “and so I don’t understand this radical interpretation. In fact, it’s not even an interpretation. It’s just crazy.”




Muslim Calif. College Professor Hands Out Middle East Map – But Israel Is Missing

Muslims follow the Nazi format “If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth.” With this format in hand they began  altering European education in the 1970’s, a demand on the EU from Euro-Arab collaboration, that began distorting educational materials and eliminate Islam’s brutal contribution to our history in our text books. It also opened the door to a wave of Muslim mass immigration that has toppled beyond control today.

This demand to ‘change’ the educational materials posed a specific slanted distortion about the facts about Israel’s struggle to keep illegal muslim mass immigration by Hamas terrorists at bay from their country, who forced their way into Israel from Egypt and Arabia in the 1930’s. Instead, Israel – the victim of brutal occupation – has now become more and more portrayed as the aggressor. Silly socialist libertarian ‘Save Gaza’ groups are springing up all over the place supporting a terrorist organization that uses private residences and civilians as shields and use children solely to train them into terrorists.

This distortion of educational materials is one of the steps Muslim use to neutralize external support that may stop them in their tracks, so they can continue their illegal infiltration without obstacles. As we have seen with the Muslim Brotherhood, you can even get socialist libtard’s handing you weapons and money to invade and occupy other people and their nations, and stage coups!

Now, this very same Arab propaganda and distortions are being applied to schools across America. And after 10-20 years students will begin to be convinced that Israel had no presence in the region and was an invader an occupier, of which none is true. Don’t let the Arabs get a stronghold of the minds of your youth; inform them about the brutality of Islam, the infiltration, the endless propaganda, the fake footage and pictures. Tell them the truth: that this is Islam’s strategy to deceive non-Muslims to meet their aims for conquest.



Calif. College Professor Hands Out Middle East Map — but Something Big Is Missing

THE BLAZE  Sep. 17, 2013 1:53pm

Some San Diego State University students studying the Arabic language were dismayed when they were handed a map by their professor at the beginning of the semester which labeled the State of Israel as “Palestine.”

The pro-Israel advocacy group StandWithUs tells TheBlaze that the professor, Ghassan Zakaria [Center for Islamic and Arabic Studies, SDU], distributed the map on the second day his Arabic 101 class met. Students worried that if they complained about the map they could be labeled as “troublemakers” and that their grades could be impacted, StandWithUs said, adding students turned to the organization fo help. The group urged its members to contact the university to complain.

Guess Whats Wrong with the Map of Israel a San Diego Arabic Professor Handed Out?

“It is a language class, it’s not a class about conflict,” a student who asked not to be named told San Diego’s KGTV.

Another student said, “Bringing his own bias to the classroom was just not o.k.”

“This is not only anti-Israel, it’s the elimination of Israel,” said Nicole Bernstein who is executive director of StandWithUs-San Diego.

Bernstein says she spoke with the Arabic department chair who explained that the professor handed out the map labeling the territory as “Palestine” in order to reflect the views of Arabic speakers in the Middle East.

Bernstein says the university further told the pro-Israel organization that the professor planned to assign students to research the politics of the region in order to prompt a discussion of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Israeli history.

San Diego State University issued the following statement to KGTV last Tuesday: “While SDSU encourages scholarly debate and discussion of varying opinions, presenting inaccurate information to students in not acceptable. SDSU’s Provost has conferred with the department chair, who spoke with the faculty member. This inaccurate portrayal will not reoccur.”  ….

To read the full story and see video report go here

Breaking News: Muslim Brotherhood official, former Clinton Foundation employee arrested in Cairo

Guys, check the level of infiltration permitted into the U.S. government on all levels through foundations, marriage (like Huma Abedin’s marriage to Antony Weiner), advisory boards, Universities and what not. Obama is giving them entry everywhere. Is there any wonder the man has no clue what on earth he is doing? With this kind of extremist propaganda tools to draw ‘advice’ from the U.S. hardly needs any other enemies.
And pay attention to the beard on the photo below….  Muslims and beards is not about facial decoration or looking pretty, folks. Its one of the physical attributes of extremist affiliation or support.



Muslim Brotherhood official, former Clinton Foundation employee arrested in Cairo

By Adam Kredo — The Washington Free Beacon  |  Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Gehad el-Haddad. (Image: LinkedIn)

A senior Muslim Brotherhood official who, until recently, had been employed by the William J. Clinton Foundation was arrested in Cairo on Tuesday and charged with inciting violence.

Gehad el-Haddad served as one of the Muslim Brotherhood’s top communications officials until Egyptian security forces seized him as part of a wider crackdown on officials loyal to ousted former President Mohamed Morsi.

Before emerging as a top Brotherhood official and adviser to Morsi, el-Haddad served for five years as a top official at the Clinton Foundation, a nonprofit group founded by former President Bill Clinton.

El-Haddad gained a reputation for pushing the Muslim Brotherhood’s Islamist agenda in the foreign press, where he was often quoted defending the Brotherhood’s crackdown on civil liberties in Egypt.

He was raised in a family of prominent Brotherhood supporters and became the public face of the Islamist organization soon after leaving his post at the Clinton Foundation.

However, much of his official work with the Brotherhood took place while he was still claiming to be employed by the Clinton Foundation.

“It was only a matter of time before Gehad el-Haddad was arrested,” Egypt expert Eric Trager told the Washington Free Beacon. “Many of the other Muslim Brotherhood spokesmen have been apprehended, and in addition to decapitating the organization, the military-backed government has been specifically targeting the Brotherhood’s media wing, including by shutting down its T.V. stations at the time of Morsi’s ouster on July 3.”

“It has also gone after those connected to Morsi’s presidential office, and Gehad’s father is Morsi adviser and Muslim Brotherhood Guidance Office member Essam el-Haddad,” noted Trager, a next generation fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP).

El-Haddad’s father was a top foreign policy adviser for Morsi until both were apprehended by Egyptian security personnel.

El-Haddad’s arrest sparked outrage among Brotherhood supporters, scores of whom have taken to the street in protest in the weeks since Morsi was removed from office and seized by the Egyptian military.

“We are thinking about you and you are in our prayers,” one supporter wrote on Twitter Wednesday.

“Freedom for #gehad el haddad,” tweeted another.

El-Haddad served as the Clinton Foundation’s city director from August 2007 to August 2012, according to his LinkedIn profile.

Just a month after El-Haddad left the Clinton Foundation to work full-time for the Brotherhood, former President Morsi was invited to deliver his first major speech at the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), the high profile political family’s other nonprofit.

El-Haddad’s employment at the Clinton Foundation overlapped with his official work for the Muslim Brotherhood, which began in Cairo in February 2011 when he assumed control of the Renaissance Project, a Brotherhood-backed economic recovery program.

El-Haddad officially became a senior adviser for foreign affairs in Morsi’s Freedom and Justice Party in May 2011, when he was still claiming to be employed by the Clinton Foundation.

El-Haddad was quoted in the Guardian newspaper in March 2012 as “one of the Brotherhood’s senior advisers.” USA Today referred to him as “a senior adviser to the Muslim Brotherhood” in May 2012.

El-Haddad was “charged with developing a long-term economic recovery program,” known as the Renaissance Project, during his time as senior adviser.

Egyptian media reported in July 2012 that the program was actually meant to bring the country more in line with the Muslim Brotherhoods extremist religious ideals.

“Renaissance is far more than the electoral program of President Mohamed Morsi or the Brotherhood’s political wing, the Freedom and Justice Party,” the Egypt Independent reported at the time. “It is a 25-year project to reform state, business and civil society, rooted in the Brotherhood’s Islamic values but conditioned by the experiences of the project’s founders in the modern economy.”

Haddad told the Independent that he applied the knowledge he learned at the Clinton Foundation to his work at the Renaissance Project.

“The Clinton Climate Initiative taught Haddad about managing an NGO and the role that civil society takes between the state and private sector, lessons he is applying to the Renaissance Project,” the report states.

El-Haddad represented the Clinton Foundation’s Clinton Climate Initiative in Egypt during his overlapping tenure, according to his LinkedIn profile.

He additionally “setup the foundation’s office in Egypt and managed official registration,” “supervised policy-making workshops & presented foundations views,” and “presented projects to high-level government officials,” among many other duties.

El-Haddad left the Clinton Foundation in August 2012, two months after Morsi assumed the Egyptian presidency.

He was appointed a “senior adviser and media spokesman” to the Muslim Brotherhood in January 2013 and served in that role until his arrest.

El-Haddad regularly defended the Brotherhood’s authoritarian crackdown on civil society, even running damage control in December 2012 when Morsi supporters attacked women and children.

When widespread Democratic protests broke out on June 30, El-Haddad referred to the demonstrators as violent thugs in an interview with the Free Beacon.

“The anti-Morsi camp are providing a political endorsement to the violence,” he said at the time. “Some have resorted to violence because they didn’t do well at the ballot box.”

El-Haddad did not respond to an email request for comment sent shortly after reports emerged of his arrest.

The Clinton Foundation did not respond to multiple requests for comment on El-Haddad’s employment and arrest.

• Adam Kredo is senior writer for the Washington Free Beacon.

The 4 Stages of Islamic Conquest

by Civilus Defendus, with a hat tip to Kali Politus

(Video by LSA, PDF version here. Click, save, share.)


Muslims begin moving to non-Muslim countries in increasing numbers and the beginning of cultural conflicts are visible, though often subtle.

  • First migration wave to non-Muslim “host” country.
  • Appeal for humanitarian tolerance from the host society.
  • Attempts to portray Islam as a peaceful & Muslims as victims of misunderstanding and racism (even though Islam is not a ‘race’).
  • High Muslim birth rate in host country increase Muslim population.
  • Mosques used to spread Islam and dislike of host country & culture.
  • Calls to criminalize “Islamophobia” as a hate crime.
  • Threatened legal action for perceived discrimination.
  • Offers of “interfaith dialogue” to indoctrinate non-Muslims.

How many nations are suffering from Islamic infiltration? One? A handful? Nearly every nation? The Islamic ‘leadership” of the Muslim Brotherhood and others wish to dissolve each nation’s sovereignty and replace it with the global imposition of Islamic sharia law. Sharia law, based on the koran, sira and hadith, condemns liberty and forbids equality and is inconsistent with the laws of all Western nations. As the author and historian Serge Trifkovic states:

“The refusal of the Western elite class to protect their nations from jihadist infiltration is the biggest betrayal in history.”


Muslim immigrants and host country converts continue demands for accommodation in employment, education, social services, financing and courts.

  • Proselytizing increases; Establishment and Recruitment of Jihadi cells.
  • Efforts to convert alienated segments of the population to Islam.
  • Revisionist efforts to Islamize history.
  • Efforts to destroy historic evidence that reveal true Islamism.
  • Increased anti-western propaganda and psychological warfare.
  • Efforts to recruit allies who share similar goals (communists, anarchists).
  • Attempts to indoctrinate children to Islamist viewpoint.
  • Increased efforts to intimidate, silence and eliminate non-Muslims.
  • Efforts to introduce blasphemy and hate laws in order to silence critics.
  • Continued focus on enlarging Muslim population by increasing Muslim births and immigration.
  • Use of charities to recruit supporters and fund jihad.
  • Covert efforts to bring about the destruction of host society from within.
  • Development of Muslim political base in non-Muslim host society.
  • Islamic Financial networks fund political growth, acquisition of land.
  • Highly visible assassination of critics aimed to intimidate opposition.
  • Tolerance of non-Muslims diminishes.
  • Greater demands to adopt strict Islamic conduct.
  • Clandestine amassing of weapons and explosives in hidden locations.
  • Overt disregard/rejection of non-Muslim society’s legal system, culture.
  • Efforts to undermine and destroy power base of non-Muslim religions including and especially Jews and Christians.

Is there a pattern here? Theo van Gogh is murdered in the Netherlands for ‘insulting’ Islam; the Organization of the Islamic Conference demands ‘anti-blasphemy’ laws through the United Nations; France is set afire regularly by ‘youths’ (read Muslims); the rise of (dis-) honor killings…holocaust denial…anti-Semitism…deception re the tenets of Islam; hatred toward Christians and Jews and Hindus and Buddhists.  The pattern for all to see is the rise of Islamic intolerance and the covert/cultural jihad to remake host societies into sharia-compliant worlds – to remove host sovereignty and replace it with Islamic sharia law.  Sharia law that condemns earthly liberty and individual freedom, that forbids equality among faiths and between the sexes, that rejects the concept of nations outside the global house of Islam, that of dar al-Islam.


Open violence to impose Sharia law and associated cultural restrictions; rejection of host government, subjugation of other religions and customs.

  • Intentional efforts to undermine the host government & culture.
  • Acts of barbarity to intimidate citizens and foster fear and submission.
  • Open and covert efforts to cause economic collapse of the society.
  • All opposition is challenged and either eradicated or silenced.
  • Mass execution of non-Muslims.
  • Widespread ethnic cleansing by Islamic militias.
  • Rejection and defiance of host society secular laws or culture.
  • Murder of “moderate” Muslim intellectuals who don’t support Islamization.
  • Destruction of churches, synagogues and other non-Muslim institutions.
  • Women are restricted further in accordance with Sharia law.
  • Large-scale destruction of population, assassinations, bombings.
  • Toppling of government and usurpation of political power.
  • Imposition of Sharia law

The website keeps track of the number of violent jihad attacks as best it can. The site lists more than 14,000 attacks since September 2001. It is worth a visit. What is occurring, however, that is likely inestimable are events where muslims are bullied by other muslims for not being “muslim enough,” where non-Muslims are intimidated into doing or not doing what they desire, where remnant populations are in a death spiral simply for being non-muslim in a predominantly muslim area. Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists Animists and Atheists meet with death, property destruction or confiscation, forced conversion, rape, excessive taxation (the jizya), enslavement, riotous mobs and various other forms of islam (in-) justice at the hands of muslims in Sudan, Philippines, Kenya, Malaysia, India, etc.  And let us not forget ‘death to Apostates’ the world over.


Islam becomes the only religious-political-judicial-cultural ideology.

  • Sharia becomes the “law of the land.
  • All non-Islamic human rights cancelled.
  • Enslavement and genocide of non-Muslim population.
  • Freedom of speech and the press eradicated.
  • All religions other than Islam are forbidden and destroyed.
  • Destruction of all evidence of non-Muslim culture, populations and symbols in country (Buddhas, houses of worship, art, etc).

The House of Islam (“peace”), dar al-Islam, includes those nations that have submitted to Islamic rule, to the soul crushing, liberty-condemning, discriminatory law of Sharia. The rest of the world in in the House of War, dar al-harb, because it does not submit to Sharia, and exists in a state of rebellion or war with the will of ‘Allah.’ No non-Muslim state or its citizens are “innocent,” and remain viable targets of war for not believing in ‘Allah.’ The Christian, Jewish, Coptic, Hindu and Zoroastrian peoples of world have suffered under subjugation for centuries. The Dhimmi-esque are forbidden to construct houses of worship or repair existing ones, economically crippled by the heavy jizya (tax), socially humiliated, legally discriminated against, criminally targeted and generally kept in a permanent state of weakness, fear and vulnerability by Islamic governments.

It should be noted that forced conversions (Egypt) and slavery (Sudan) are still reported. Homosexuals have been hung in the public square in Iran. Young girls are married to old men. Apostates are threatened with death. “Honor” killings are routine. Women are legally second-class citizens, though Muslim males insist they are “treated better” than in the West. These more obvious manifestations may distract from some less obvious ones such as the lack of intellectual inquiry in science, narrow scope of writing, all but non-existent art and music, sexual use and abuse of youth and women, and the disregard for personal fulfillment, joy and wonder. Look into the eyes of a recently married 12 year old girl to see the consequence of the moral deprivation spawned by Islam.

The 4 Stages of Islamic Conquest is also available in pdf format for easy sharing as part of “Liberty vs Sharia

My Jihad – Mein Kampf: Hitler’s Role Model

Excerpt from Craig Winn’s Prophet of Doom
Chapter 24 – Profitable Prophet Plan
(pages 658-670)

With the prophet’s career summarized and his attributes documented, it’s time we take a final look at the man who mirrored his character and mission. Only miles and years distinguished Hitler from his mentor.

Der fuhrer’s methods for accomplishing his madness were identical to der prophet’s.

Mein Kampf: 676 “Spiritual terror…men must threaten and dominate men by compulsion. Compulsion is only broken by compulsion and terror by terror.” On the road to power, compulsion follows seduction. And the lever that coerces compulsion is terror. Hitler simply followed Muhammad’s path.

Bukhari:V4B52N220 “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘I have been made victorious with terror.'”

Mein Kampf:677 “Since our view of life will never share power with another, it cannot co-operate with the existing doctrines it condemns. It is obliged to fight by all available means until the entire world of hostile ideas collapses.”

Throughout the entirety of the Islamic era we have heard a singular battle cry:

Bukhari:V4B53N386 “Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone.” Both men envisioned an eternal battle and total submission.

Mein Kampf:677 “This corrosive fight…for the new program and new view of life [religion] demands determined fighters…and a forceful fighting organization. The recipe for a favorable result requires the formulation of a declaration of war against all existing order [religions and doctrines], and against all existing conceptions of life in general.” Just like Islam, it was the Nazis against the world. The “House of Islam” forever battles the “House of War.”

Tabari IX:69 “He who believes in Allah and His Messenger has protected his life and possessions from us. As for those who disbelieve, we will fight them forever in the Cause of Allah. Killing them is a small matter to us.”

The Nazis usurped Muhammad’s dogma. The recipe of “submit and obey” was perfect for empowering their tyrant.

Mein Kampf:679 “The strength of a party lies in the disciplined obedience of the members to follow their leadership. The decisive factors are leadership and discipline. When troops battle one another, the victorious one will be that which is blindly obedient to the Superior Leader.”

Islam says:

Ishaq:601 “The best men launch spears as if they were swords. They peer forward unweariedly. They devote their lives to their Prophet. In hand-to-hand fighting and cavalry attacks they purify themselves with the blood of the infidels. They consider that an act of piety.”

Front Cover
Prophet of Doom is a great and well researched book written by Craig Winn. We highly recommend you get this book if you want a shortcut to Islam. To order the book by click on the cover.

It is hard to distinguish which poligious doctrine was more fixated on violence.

Mein Kampf:680 “In order to lead a view of life to victory, we have to transform it into a fighting movement.”

Ishaq:587 “Our onslaught will not be a weak faltering affair. We shall fight as long as we live. We will fight until you turn to Islam, humbly seeking refuge. We will fight not caring whom we meet. We will fight whether we destroy ancient holdings or newly gotten gains. We have cut off every opponent’s nose and ears with our swords. We have driven them violently before us at the command of Allah and Islam. We will fight until our religion is established. And we will plunder them for they must suffer disgrace.”

Like Muhammad, Hitler seduced men before he coerced them. He made promises but never delivered.

Mein Kampf:683 “The Party with its program of twenty-five points is unshakable.”

Ten of the twenty-five Nazi pillars were financial inducements, bribes if you will. Twelve were control mechanisms. Three were focused on fighting. The following Islamic concepts made Hitler’s list in Mein Kampf : “abrogation,” “duty,” “annulment of treaties,” the “confiscation of war booty,” profit sharing or “distribution of spoils,” the party’s cut or “fifth,” “conquest,” “expulsion of nonbelievers,” “alms” or pensions for believers, “Jewish businesses to be looted and divided,” “Jewish land to become communal,” a “ban on Jewish usury,” “Jews to be punished by death,” “the establishment of the laws” of der Fuhrer,” the formation of “an army,” “restrictions on journalists,” and a “recasting of Christianity.” Apart from time and place, der fuhrer’s list was an awful lot like der prophet’s.

Both men were serious about their personal views. It was their way or the highway.

Mein Kampf:698 “The N.S.G.W.P. must not become a bailiff of public opinion, but its ruler. It must not be the masse.’ slave, but their master!”

Muhammad wasn’t much of a listener either.

Qur’an 47.21 “Were they to obey, showing their obedience in modest speech, after the matter of preparation for Jihad had been determined for them, it would have been better.”

If the definition of propaganda is artful deceit, Hitler and Muhammad were grand masters.

Mein Kampf:701 “On behalf of our view of life I will strike the weapon of reply from the enemy’s hand personally.” And how might der fuhrer accomplish this?

Mein Kampf:702 “Skillful propaganda…. The best proof of this was furnished by the success of the propaganda, introduced by me, against the peace treaty of Versailles. I had before me a surging crowd filled with most sacred indignation and utter wrath. A great lie had been torn out of the brains and hearts of a multitude, and in its stead, a truth had been implanted…. In this meeting I became familiar with the pathos and the gestures which mesmerizing a thousand people demands.”

Islam and Nazism share an unhealthy trait, the willingness to link “sacred” to “wrath.” And neither can be trusted as they are willing to abrogate treaties which they do not like.

Qur’an 9.3 “And a declaration from Allah and His Messenger to all mankind: ‘Allah is free from all treaty obligations with non-Muslims and so is His Messenger.”

Confirming the role of seductive verbal expression in achieving victory, der fuhrer shared:

Mein Kampf:704 “The emphasis was put on the spoken word because only it is in a position to bring about great changes for general psychological reasons. Enormous world revolutionary events have not been brought about by the written word, but by the spoken word.”

Mein Kampf:704 “The agitatory activity of speech is bound to have mass influence.”

Hitler went on to say that spoken words were like pictures because they communicate more vividly and faster than text. His mentor never allowed his words to be written or read, only spoken. And that’s because:

Bukhari:V6B60N662 “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Some eloquent speech is as effective as magic.'”

Bukhari:V9B87N127 “The Prophet said, ‘I have been given the keys of eloquent speech and given victory with terror so the treasures of the earth were given to me.'”

Expounding upon the merits of Muhammad’s situational scriptures, der fuhrer said,

Mein Kampf:706 “The great speaker senses the words that he needs to use in order to impassion his audience. If he errs he has the opportunity for correction. He can read his listener.’ expressions to see if they understand, and can repeat his message until he has convinced them of the correctness of what he has said.”

This reminds me of the 8th surah in which Muhammad changed his presentation of the power of Islamic terror on the fly. When his militants appeared displeased with Allah’s proclamation, Muhammad corrected the error and lessened the odds.

Ishaq:326 “Abdullah told me that when this verse came down it was a shock to the Muslims who took it hard. They were afraid, as the odds were too great. So Allah relieved them and cancelled the verse with another: ‘Now has Allah relieved you and He knows that there is a weakness among you, so if there are 100 [rather than 20] they shall vanquish 200.'”

The 66th verse corrected the 65th. Instant abrogation. Just add grumbling.

Der fuhrer also explained why an oral recital had to be as repetitive as the Qur’an – a word which means “to recite.”

Mein Kampf:706 “The great speaker will repeat his message so often, with so many examples, he will overcome objections and refute them before they are even raised.”

While the Mecca surahs were fixated on pain and punishment, with the vast majority of the 1,000 repetitions occurring therein, the Medina themes were no less repetitive. They bellowed: submit, obey, perform, pay, and fight.

Hitler and Muhammad learned that their demonic message was most effective when it was revealed in the darkness of night.

Mein Kampf:710 “I was astonished by how much better my message was received at night…. It’s a mysterious magic that allows an encroachment upon man’s free will. In the evening they succumb more easily to the dominating force of a stronger will. The domineering apostolic nature weakens their resistance.” Islam’s apostle used the same psychology to weaken men’s resistance:

Qur’an 73.1 “Keep watch all the night except a little, reciting the Qur’an as it ought to be recited in slow, measured rhythmic tones. We will soon entrust you with Our weighty Word. Surely the night is the most devout way when the soul is most receptive and the words are the most telling.”

The most telling line, “magic allows an encroachment upon man’s free will,” exposes the dark spirit’s agenda. This is why Islam and Nazism are fatalistic and why they are devoted to submission and obedience. If deceit encroaches on man’s free will, we lose our ability to choose Yahweh and to accept his gift of eternal life. When we lose our free will, we lose the ability to love and to know God. When we lose the ability to choose, we die. It isn’t a coincidence that history’s least-free poligious communities have succumbed to doctrines of submission. Death and destruction was not only predictable, it was a predetermined consequence.

Hitler, like his mentor, despised scribes.

Mein Kampf:712 “The average sparrow brain of the scribbler produces intellectual babble.” Muhammad dispensed with the verbal assault. He simply killed them.

Mein Kampf:715 “The [mosque] meeting is necessary if only because new adherents of a new movement feel lonely and are easily seized with the fear of being alone. Brought together they sense a greater community…. They are carried away by the powerful effect of the suggestive intoxication and enthusiasm of the others. The crowd confirms the correctness of the new doctrine in his mind and removes doubt. He then succumbs to the magic seductive influence of the [mosque] meeting.”

Mein Kampf:717 “God be praised and thanked that unspoilt people avoid bourgeois mass meetings as the Devil avoids holy water.” Togetherness can be as seductive as it is coercive. It is the essence of mob mentality. An evil person with a bad idea can be parlayed into an eruption of uncontrollable rage.

Ishaq:580 “Our strong warriors obey his orders to the letter. By us Allah’s religion is undeniably strong. You would think when our horses gallop with bits in their mouths that the sounds of demons are among them. The day we trod down the unbelievers, there was no deviation or turning from the Apostle’s order. During the battle the people heard our exhortations to fight and the smashing of skulls by swords that sent heads flying. We severed necks with a warrior’s blow. Often we have left the slain cut to pieces and a widow crying ‘ala.’ over her mutilated husband.”

The study of Islam, like Nazism, is an exposé on gang mentality. Uncorrupted by Islam, or left free to choose, few if any Arabs would have been capable of perpetrating such horrific deeds. Yet as part of Muhammad’s gang of ghouls, they fed off each other’s rage.

Terror and piracy became good because everyone they knew was a terrorizing pirate. This is why Christianity is personal – not collective. The Greek word ekklesia that we errantly translate “Church” really means “a calling out.”

Then sounding like Muhammad in Mecca, der fuhrer preached these words in Munich,

Mein Kampf:715 “The man who is the first representative of a new doctrine is exposed to serious oppression and urgently needs the strengthening that lies in the conviction of being a fighter in an embracing body.” Muhammad found his soul mates in Medina.

Ishaq:596 “You came to us discredited, when your message was rejected and we believed you. You were forsaken and deserted and we assisted you. You were a fugitive and we took you in, sheltering you. You were poor and in need and we comforted you.”

Mein Kampf:720 “It was important to introduce blind discipline into our meetings and to safeguard the authority of the leader. The brutal recklessness of our guards were able to thwart the enemy’s hecklers.”

Speaking as if he were Muhammad, Hitler said,

Mein Kampf:726 “Anyone who provoked us was thrown out ruthlessly. We would not tolerate any provocation”

Mein Kampf:728 “Before they could finish a sentence they would find themselves thrown outside the hall.” It was no different in Muhammad’s day.

Ishaq:246 “Hypocrites used to assemble in the mosque and listen to the stories of the Muslims and laugh and scoff at their religion. So Muhammad ordered that they should be ejected. They were thrown out with great violence. Abu went to Amr, took his foot and dragged him out of the mosque. Another Muslim slapped a man’s face while dragging him forcefully, knocking him down. One was pulled violently by his hair. ‘Don’t come near the Apostle’s mosque again, for you are unclean.'”

Even today, they fear truth.

Der fuhrer and der prophet had security detachments. Hitler called the first of these “Storm Troops.”

Mein Kampf:729 “I had a protective detachment as a supervision service. They were all young Party comrades who were instructed and trained to the effect that terror can be broken only by terror. By fighting for our idea, they protected me with their last drop of blood. They were saturated with the doctrine. We found that the best weapon of defense was the attack. We became known not as a debating club but as a fighting community. My boys shined when I made clear to them the necessity of their mission, assuring them again and again that all the wisdom in the world will remain futile if force does not enter its service, defending and protecting it. The Goddess of Peace can only march side by side with the God of War.”

Muhammad’s thugs weren’t quite as articulate, but they were no less loyal.

Ishaq:580 “We helped Allah’s Apostle, angry on his account, with a thousand warriors. We carried his flag on the end of our lances. We were his helpers, protecting his banner in deadly combat. We dyed it with blood, for that was its color. We were the Prophet’s right arm in Islam. We were his bodyguards before other troops served him. We helped him against his opponents. Allah richly rewarded that fine Prophet Muhammad.”

Like the good Muslims who left their homes to fight jihad for Muhammad, Hitler had helpers too:

Mein Kampf:730 “And how these boys stood up! Like a swarm of hornets they stormed upon the mockers at our meeting incurring wounds and making sacrifices so that they made a path for the holy mission of our movement.”

Mein Kampf:747 “The boys of the Storm Troop performed their duty. They attacked like wolves…. Our opponents learned a lesson they will never forget.”

This is reminiscent of the 8th surah which says: “Inflict upon them such a defeat as will be a lesson for others, that they may be warned.” And the Hadith which substituted one pest for another.

Ishaq:564 “The Muslims stole our goods and divided them. Their spears pierced us not once but twice. Their squadrons came at us like a swarm of locusts. Were it not for the religion of Muhammad’s people, their cavalry would never have attacked us.”

Hitler dedicates a number of pages to his personal involvement in choosing the Nazi colors (black and red, symbolizing deceit and blood) and his swastika. Der fuhrer’s fixation on his flag was no different than the prophet’s fixation on his war banners which we were told were white, black, and blood red.

Mein Kampf:733 “They became a symbol for the fight of the future…. It had the effect of a flaming torch.” Just as Muhammad had usurped the concept of war banners from his pagan ancestor Qusayy, Hitler recycled an old tradition.

Mein Kampf:736 “The swastika had been used as a symbol of the Germanic [pagan] religion by folkish groups in primitive cults.” Even in the details, they were indistinguishable.

This next passage encapsulates Muhammad’s reason for founding Islam.

Mein Kampf:752 “Destiny chooses the Man and Destiny gives him the final victory. Dissatisfied with the religious life of his people, he longs for a renovation. Based upon his inspiration he is called upon to present a solution for this religious distress, appearing like a prophet of a new doctrine and as a fighter against the existing ones.” There is no more effective means to rule people than to claim that you are called to be “god’s” prophet, and then to mix your poison with the passion of a pugilist.

Ishaq:530 “Get out of his way, you infidel unbelievers. Every good thing goes with His Apostle. O Lord, I believe in his word. I know Allah’s [Fate’s, a.k.a. Satan’s] truth in accepting it. We will fight you about its interpretations as we have fought you about its revelation with strokes that will remove heads from shoulders and make enemies of friends.”

If you were to replace Nature with Allah, this Hitlerism could be Qur’anic.

Mein Kampf:752 “The strongest man is chosen for fulfilling the great mission. One Man is the One who is exclusively called upon.”

Mein Kampf:753 “They have the purest faith in their own mission, they consider themselves obliged to go their own way without considering others. Nature Herself, in Her inexorable logic, makes the decision by prompting fights and by leading that movement to the goal that has been chosen by the clearest, shortest, and surest way.”

Qur’an 59.6 “Allah gives his Messenger Lordship and Power over whomever He wills.”

Qur’an 49.7 “And know that among you is Allah’s Messenger: were he to follow your (wishes), you would fall into misfortune….”

By promising “Valhalla,” a seductive, pagan, and hedonistic “paradise” to those who sacrificed their lives for the “cause,” the second tyrant mirrored the first.

Mein Kampf:768 “It is certain that each hero who comes forward voluntarily, and dies the sacred death of martyrdom climbs the steps to Valhalla.” This is no different than: Qur’an 4.74 “Let those who fight in the Cause of Allah sell the life of this world for the hereafter. To him who fights in the Cause of Allah, whether he is slain or gets victory – soon shall We give him a great reward.”

Speaking of the Germans who rejected him, Hitler’s never-ending argument replicates Muhammad’s:

Mein Kampf:768 “They are ‘scum.’ ‘rabble, deserters, and pimps who shunned the light.’ ‘hyenas.’ ‘freeloaders.’ ‘thieves, and duty shirkers.’ ‘traitors,’ and an ‘undisciplined gang of looters, criminals, and evil rabble.'”

But alas, even Hitler had to outmaneuver and threaten the peaceful hypocrites.

Mein Kampf:756 “Some people merely pretend that they are fighting for the same goal, but they do not honestly place themselves into the ranks of our movement.”

Qur’an 8.5 “Your Lord ordered you out of your homes to fight for the true cause even though some Muslims disliked it, and were averse to fighting. They argued with you concerning this matter even after it was made clear to them. It was as if they were being driven to their death.”

Der fuhrer was as humble as der prophet.

Mein Kampf:763 “One must never forget that everything that is actually great in this world has not been fought for and won by coalitions, but always by the success of One Individual victor. The religious State will never be created by compromise but only by the steel-hard willpower of one sole movement which has struggled its way against all others.” Qur’an 48.1 “Verily We have granted you (Muhammad) a splendid Victory.

Qur’an 48.8 “We have truly sent you (Muhammad) as a witness, as a bringer of Good News, and as a Warner: In order that you (men) may believe in Allah and His Messenger, that you may assist him and honor him, and celebrate His praise morning and evening.”

Islam and Nazism seduced a sufficient number of men to become popular enough to build a coercive militant force. Both usurped pagan traditions to condition adherents and then established absolute authority over them.

Mein Kampf:765 “If popularity and force unite then authority can be established more solidly based upon tradition. When popularity, force, and tradition combine, authority becomes unshakable.”

This is Islam in a nutshell.

Writing words that would come to haunt the world fifteen and then again seventy-seven years after they were scribed by Hitler’s hand, we discover:

Mein Kampf:787 “Terror which is derived from a religion can never be broken by a formal State power. It will only succumb to a new view of life that proceeds with equal boldness and determination. The State may for centuries apply the strongest means of power against a terror by which it is threatened, but in the end it will be powerless and will succumb.”

Hitler and Muhammad were unaware of a power stronger than hate, and of a tool more effective than terror. That force is love and its implement is truth. And that is how we must fight “terror which is derived from a religion.” We must love the victims of Islam enough to free them from deceit. By emancipating mankind from Muhammad’s legacy we free ourselves from its scourge.

But Hitler was right in a way. Nations like America are unable to break the back of religious terror. We are unwilling to confront a religion. But by not understanding the source of the terrorist.’ rage, we eliminate them far more slowly than the religotic manufactures new ones. And even if we were to shed our ignorance, conventional defensive and offensive military tactics are counterproductive. Offensively, massive armaments and air superiority only prevail against conventional forces. Terrorists scatter, lying in wait to strike another day. And defensively, the freedoms we usurp from our citizens under the guise of “Homeland Security” only serve to create the totalitarian climate in which religious terrorists thrive.

While there is good news, I’m afraid it may be too late. To combat poligious terror we don’t have to become like them, as Hitler attests. All we have to do is come to understand the deceit that drives men to such madness. Collectively, if we were to see Muhammad and his terrorist dogma Islam as we now see Hitler and Nazism, we would win the war on terror by freeing Muslims from Islam. Light extinguishes darkness, and courageous, sacrificial love overwhelms fear, hate, and terror.

While Hitler’s argument was wrong, it remains seductive. A time will come, according to Bible prophets, in which America and Europe will tire of their government.’ inability to thwart the continued onslaught of Islamic terror. They will be tempted, as were 1930s Germans, to employ the services of a similarly-minded tyrant to protect them. Like Hitler, this evil man will rise to prominence promising “peace.” But once empowered, he’ll unleash hell’s fury – literally. The religotic he’ll deploy will be as demonic as Nazism and Islam.

Mein Kampf:981 “To end this eternal shame, people will prefer to accept the terror of the moment rather than bear an endless terror any longer.”

Hitler went on to plagiarize two of Allah’s favorite words.

Mein Kampf:798 “What we need is not one hundred daring plotters, but many hundreds of thousands of fanatical fighters for our view of life.”

Mein Kampf:801 “Give the German nation six million bodies, faultlessly trained, all of them glowing with passion for the highest spirit of attack, and we will have an army.”

Qur’an 47.4 “Therefore, when you clash with the unbelieving Infidels in battle, strike them and overpower them. At length, when you have thoroughly subdued them, make them prisoners in bondage until the war lays down its burdens. Thus are you commanded. He lets you fight in order to test you. But those who are slain in Allah’s Cause will never have their deeds go to waste.”

Qur’an 47.31 “We shall try you until We know those among you who are the fighters; and We shall try your reported mettle.”

Qur’an 47.33 “Believers, obey Allah, and obey the Messenger! Those who disbelieve and hinder men from the Cause of Allah [Jihad], He will not pardon. Do not falter; become faint-hearted, or weak-kneed, crying for peace. You have the upper hand.”

Muhammad’s contemporaries saw him as a lying thief and a murdering bandit. We know this because their criticisms are chronicled in the Qur’an. Hitler was not immune. His contemporaries:

Mein Kampf:807 “Lovingly showered upon us the pet names: ‘murderers, bandits, robbers, and criminals.’ But the S.A. [Storm Troop] maintained perfect order…daring to smash the skulls in of those who resisted.” The translators of Mein Kampf provided the grim details. During the formation period of Nazism (1923-1931): “The Hitlerites killed 323 Marxists and seriously wounded 750. Other Nazi rivals lost 48 men. The perpetrators of Mein Kampf suffered 86 dead and 25 wounded.” But as with the initial Islamic terrorist raids perpetrated by Muhammad, one murder quickly led to another. Death became an avalanche. Scores of rotting corpses became hundreds, then thousands, then millions.

Returning to one of der prophet’s favorite themes, der fuhrer protests:

Mein Kampf:827 “Systematically, Jewish parasites ravish our innocent young blonde girls and thus destroy the Aryan race. Yet both Christian denominations disregard the desecration and annihilation of the noble and unique race God gave the earth. It is not important whether Protestants vanquish Catholics or Catholics vanquish Protestants, but whether Aryans survive. Any who reject his work thereby declares war on the Lord’s creation and upon his divine will.”

Ishaq:262 “Some Muslims remained friends with the Jews, so Allah sent down a Qur’an forbidding them to take Jews as friends. From their mouths hatred has already shown itself and what they conceal is worse.”

Qur’an 2.59 “We sent a plague upon the Jews from heaven, for their evil-doing.”

Qur’an 5.82 “You will find the Jews and disbelievers [defined as Christians in 5:73] the most vehement in hatred for the Muslims.”

Mein Kampf:845 “Nazism must claim the right to force its principles on the whole and educate everyone about its ideas and thoughts without regard to previous boundaries.” This is an order to impose Nazism on the world and then to indoctrinate the victims.

Bukhari:V4B52N196 “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘I have been ordered to fight the people till they say, “None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.”‘

Speaking immodestly of how he created his religotic, Hitler shares some extremely relevant insights:

Mein Kampf:848 “Great theorists are only in the rarest cases great organizers. The Greatness of the program-maker [religious founder] lies in the recognition and in the establishment of abstractly correct rules, while the organizer has to be a psychologist. He has to take man as he is, and thus must know him. He must not over evaluate him. He must try to account for his weakness and bestial nature so that the program becomes a strong, constant force, suitable for carrying an idea and paving its way to success.”

Hitler’s words bind him to Muhammad and separate both men from Moses and Christ. Islam and Nazism see man as lowly and replaceable. They appeal to man’s weakness and bestial nature. They seduce men into becoming a militant force for the benefit of the program-maker. Hitler was even suggesting that Islam was made dimwitted and bestial on purpose. It was as dumb and visceral as the men it was perpetrated upon.

The reason the word “religion” can’t be found in the Old Testament and is only used negatively in the New Testament is that Judeo-Christianity is not a religion, a movement, a cause, a mission, or a program. It’s a relationship that focuses on the spirit, not the flesh.

Mein Kampf:848 “Rarely is a great theorist a great leader. More usually he is an agitator who shows the ability of imparting an idea to the masses as a psychologist and demagogue. For to lead means to be able to move [seduce] the masses.” While I wouldn’t go so far as to say that Muhammad was a great theorist, leader, or psychologist, he was certainly an agitator and demagogue. And two out of five was sufficient to “move the masses.”

Hitler glorified himself using similar terms to those used by Islamic apologists to elevate Muhammad’s status.

Mein Kampf:849 “The combination of the theorist [prophet], organizer [politician], and leader [general] in one person is the rarest thing to be found on this globe. This combination makes the Great Man.”

By calling his message “propaganda,” Hitler was being more honest with his audience than was Muhammad. Both knew that they were lying; one had the courtesy to tell us.

Mein Kampf:851 “The first task of propaganda [Qur’an recitals] is the winning of people for the future organization [Islam]. The first task of the organization [Islam] is the winning of people for the continuation of propaganda. The second task of propaganda [the Qur’an] is the destruction of existing doctrines [Judeo-Christianity]. The second task of the organization must be the fight for power [Muslim militancy] so that by it will achieve the final success of the doctrine [world religious conquest – total submission].”

Tabari IX:82 “The Messenger sent Khalid with an army of 400 and ordered him to invite people to Islam before he fought them. If they were to respond and submit, he was to teach them the Book of Allah, the Sunnah of His Prophet, and the requirements of Islam. If they should decline, then he was to fight them.”

Ishaq:245 “The Apostle used to say, ‘Their religion will never march with ours.'”

Mein Kampf:851 “The most striking success of the revolution of a view of life will always be won whenever the new view of life [religotic] is taught [dictated] to all people, and if necessary, is forced upon them.” Neville Chamberlain gave this man the high ground of Czechoslovakia thinking that it would satiate his cravings. That proved as fatal as George Bush’s “Road Map to Peace,” in which he proposed to give the high ground of Israel to the Muslims. One doctrine has, and the other doctrine will, force its view of life on everyone within its reach.

Tabari IX:86 “Give the people the good news of Paradise and the way to attain it. Warn them of the Hell-Fire and the way to earn it. Teach them the rites of the hajj…. He orders you to offer prayer at the appropriate times with proper bowing and humility…. He orders you to give one fifth of Allah’s booty and pay the zakat tax. It is enjoined on the faithful from their land and property.”

Qur’an 8.39 “Fight them until the only religion is Islam.” When will we learn to read the words on the page? When will we come to understand that tolerating evil leads to disaster?

Islam and Nazism are intolerant, dictatorial fighting machines.

Mein Kampf:852 “The highest task of the organization is to see to it that no kind of internal disagreements among the members of the movement weaken the work of the movement. The spirit of determined aggression must not die out. It must be constantly renewed and fortified. It must never lose its fighting force and must propagate the idea with determination and attack.”

Mein Kampf:855 “The more radical and inciting my propaganda was, the more it frightened off the weaklings [hypocrites] and prevented them from pushing into the nucleus of our organization.”

Hitler would have loved this poem:

Ishaq:572 “Muhammad is the man, an Apostle of my Lord who errs not. Any who would rival him must fail. Evil was the state of our enemy so they lost the day. We came upon them like lions from the thickets. The armies of Allah came openly, flying at them in rage, so they could not get away. We destroyed them and forced them to surrender. In the former days there was no battle like this; their blood flowed freely. We slew them and left them in the dust. Those who escaped were choked with terror. A multitude of them were slain. This is Allah’s war in which those who do not accept Islam will have no chance.”

Mein Kampf:856 “Folkish [religious] visionaries procure leadership for themselves and collapse the plots that swirl around them. I was unanimously given the entire leadership of the movement. New articles were accepted which entrusted me with full responsibility and this proved its value in the most blissful manner,”

Mein Kampf:858 “All collaborators were made subordinate to me.”

Muslim:C22B20N4604 “We used to take oath to the Messenger of Allah that we would listen to and obey his orders. He would tell us to say in the oath: As far as it lies in my power.”

Qur’an 48.10 “Verily those who swear allegiance to you (Muhammad), indeed swear their allegiance to Allah.

Nazism was as peaceful as Islam.

Mein Kampf:891 “To forge the sword is the task of leadership. The mission is to seek comrades in arms.”

Mein Kampf:892 “The correct road is to strengthen our power by winning new soil and territory.”

Mein Kampf:950 “We Nazis say: ‘The right to soil and territory is a duty for a great nation must extend its boundaries.” The clues in Mein Kampf that the Nazis were intent on world conquest were no less vague than those found in the Qur’an.

Mein Kampf:953 “The German needs only to be given land by the sword.”

Bukhari:V4B52N288 “Expel disbelievers from the Arabian Peninsula.'”

Qur’an 2.191 “Slay them wherever you find and catch them, and drive them out from where they have turned you out; for persecution and oppression are worse than slaughter.”

Qur’an 33.25 “Allah drove the disbelievers back…and helped the believers in battle…. He terrorized the People of the Book so that you killed some and made many captive. He made you inherit their lands, their homes, and their wealth. He gave you a country you had not traversed before.”

Chamberlain wasn’t the only fool. Stalin also signed a “peace treaty” with Hitler years after Mein Kampf was written.

Mein Kampf:959 “The conclusion of a treaty with Russia embodies the declaration of the next war.”

Der fuhrer, like der prophet, enjoyed projecting his faults on his foes. “We must never forget that the rulers of present-day Russia are common bloodstained criminals, the scum of humanity. They butchered and rooted out millions of leading intellectuals with savagery. They have imposed the most frightful regime of tyranny of all time. The Marxist and their Jewish comrades combine bestial horror and an inconceivable gift for lying. They intend to impose bloody oppression on the whole world. One does not conclude a treaty with someone whose sole interest is destruction.” The only difference between Hitler and Muhammad in the application of this strategy was, Hitler was right.

Der Fuhrer went on to share: “The struggle against the Jewish Marxist conquest of the world requires a clear attitude towards Soviet Russia. You cannot drive out the Devil with Beelzebub [another name for Satan].” This is similar to Lucifer impersonating Gabriel while speaking for Allah and condemning Satan.

Mein Kampf:920 “Peace treaties whose demands are a scourge to a people, frequently beat the first drum roll for a coming rebellion. The boundless extortion and shameful abasement are a means of whipping up national passions to the boiling point. The propagandistic utilization of these sadistic atrocities can remove indifference and raise indignation to the most blazing anger! Every point should be burned into the brain and heart of men until sixty million share the same hate, causing a sea of flames out of whose glow a steely will arises and the cry: ‘We want more arms.’ Yes, a peace treaty could do that. It becomes the greatest propaganda weapon for re-arousing the dormant spirits of a cause.”

Mein Kampf:920 “We must reimplant in the people the spirit of proud self-respect, manly defiance, and wrathful hate.” The first Muslims didn’t take kindly to peace treaties either.

Tabari VIII:87/Ishaq:505 “The Companions of the Prophet had set out not doubting that they would conquer, because of a vision Muhammad had seen. Therefore, when they saw the negotiations for peace, the retreat, and the obligations the Messenger agreed to – the Muslims felt so grieved about it that they were close to despair. Some were depressed to the point of death.” So…

Qur’an 9.3 “An announcement from Allah and His Messenger to the people assembled on the day of the Great Pilgrimage, that Allah and His Messenger dissolve treaty obligations with the Pagans.” And then… Qur’an 9.5 “Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, torture them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war.”

Telling us how Nazi and Islamic tyrannies would use land-for-peace road-maps to propagate their fury and lead the world to war, der fuhrer explained:

Mein Kampf:921 “Everything, beginning with the child’s primer down to the last newspaper, every theater and every picture, every billboard and every wall, must be placed at the service of this single great mission, until the prayer of fear of our patriots cry, ‘Lord deliver us.’ The burning plea must come from even the smallest child: ‘Almighty God, bless our arms! Lord, bless our battle!” The Muslims also had such a “prayer.”

Bukhari:V5B59N512 “The Prophet offered the Prayer of Fear when it was still dark and said, ‘Allahu-Akbar! Khaybar is destroyed, for whenever we approach a hostile nation to fight, then evil will be the morning for those who have been warned.’ The inhabitants came out running. The Prophet had their men killed, their children and women taken as captives.”

Bukhari:V5B59N516 “When Allah’s Apostle fought or raided people we raised our voices saying, ‘Allahu-Akbar! Allahu-Akbar! None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.'”

And they went off to wage holy war:

Mein Kampf:932 “May Reason be our leader, The sacred duty to act gives us determination, and our highest Protector remains our faith.”

Mein Kampf:925 “We may suffer many bitter woes but this isn’t grounds for abandoning Reason with squabbling instead of standing up with a concentrated force against the enemy.”

Qur’an 8.60 “And make ready against the infidels all of the power you can, including steeds of war [the Noble Qur’an says these are: tanks, planes, missiles, and artillery] to threaten the enemy of Allah and your enemy. And whatever you spend in Allah’s Cause shall be repaid unto you.”

Qur’an 61.14 “O Muslims! Be helpers of Allah…We gave power to those who believed against their enemies, and they became the ones that prevailed.”

Ishaq:441 “A sharp sword in the hand of a brave man kills his adversary.”

Muhammad called his dark spirit a “Protector,” too, even when his armed force was preparing to swoop down, terrorize, and plunder innocents.

Ishaq:510 “When the Apostle looked down he said, ‘O Allah, Lord of the heavens and what they overshadow, and Lord of the Devils and what into error they throw, and Lord of the winds and what they winnow, we ask Thee for the booty of this town and its people. We take refuge in Thee from its evil and the evil of its people. Forward in the name of Allah.’ He used to say this of every town he raided.”

Mein Kampf ends as it begins, by praising martyrs, and wrapping overtly religious themes around their death.

Mein Kampf:993 “At the end of this volume I want to bring before the eyes of our adherents and of the crusaders for our doctrine those eighteen heroes to whom I dedicated the first volume of my work, as those heroes who consciously sacrificed themselves for all of us. They must always recall the fulfillment of duty, a duty which they fulfilled with the best faith despite the consequences. I want to reckon men who by words, thoughts, and deeds dedicated their lives to the awakening of our nation. I quote from Eckard’s poem: ‘Father in Heaven, resolved to the death, bow we before Thee. Does any other people follow thine awful command more loyally than do we Germans? Then Eternal One, send us the victory, Mighty with Fate. Thou smilest with joy at our holy crusade.”

I could give you any of a thousand Qur’an and Hadith quotes to match this, but instead, I’d like you to contemplate the overwhelming similarity of the message, the motivation, and the means Hitler and Muhammad used to attack mankind. Then consider the consequence of ignoring, or even tolerating, Hitler’s “holy crusade” during the fifteen years between the time he wrote it and the time he enacted it.

If we behave similarly today, now that Muhammad’s mantra has been revealed, a billion people will remain enslaved by Islam. And within a quarter century, a quarter of earth’s people will die because of it.


To buy Prophet of Doom:

If you would like a brand new copy of Prophet of Doom, please contact me, the Webmaster at webmasterMohammed Mohammad Koran I have been asking for $80 donations for these last few books. And for Canadian orders, an extra $16 covers the added shipping costs, while other International shipments cost about $25 more than US orders. Also, the US Post Office asks for a phone number to call in case there is confusion with non-US shipments. We know that this is a lot to spend on a book, but your help allows me to dedicate more time to the site and there is a limited supply of books.


The documented references in Prophet of Doom were derived from English translations of the following ancient Islamic manuscripts. I encourage you to purchase and read them. The Sirat Rasul Allah was written by Ibn Ishaq in 750 A.D. It was edited and abridged by Ibn Hisham in 830 and translated by Alfred Guillaume under the title, The Life of Muhammad in 1955 by Oxford Press. The History of al-Tabari was written by Abu Muhammad bin al-Tabari between 870 and 920 A.D. His monumental work was translated and published in 1987 through 1997 by the State University of New York Press. I quote from volumes I, II, VI, VII, VIII, and IX. Al-Bukhari’s Hadith, titled: Sahih Al-Bukhari and The True Traditions was collected by Imam Bukhari in 850 A.D. I have used the collector’s original nomenclature because the only printed English translation (Publisher-Maktaba Dar-us-Salam, Translator-Muhammad Khan) was abridged and erroneously numbered. Finally, I recommend that you acquire at least three of the following Qur’an translations: Ahmed Ali, Pikthal, Noble by Muhsin Khan, Yusuf Ali, or Shakir. The oldest Qur’an fragments date to around 725 A.D. – a century after they were first recited.

(Video) Racism against blacks in Iraq: ‘Blacks are still viewed as inferior slaves, unimportant, useless objects’

File:Slaves Zadib Yemen 13th century BNF Paris.jpg

Mohammedans selling and buying Christian, jewish and black slaves in the market. [harîrî (al-), maqâmât, Iraq, Date: 1236-1237]


The Arab enslavement of the Dinka people.

File:Slaves ruvuma.jpg

Muslims capturing and hacking disobedient slaves, 1866.
Captioned, “Slavers Revenging their Losses,” shows a coffle of men, women, and children, led by Arab slavers; one of the guards is murdering a captive unable to keep up with the rest. These people were taken across Central Africa to the east coast of Africa. The engravings in this book are based on, according to the editor,” rude sketches” made by Livingstone. On June 19, 1866, Livingstone wrote: “We passed a woman tied by the neck to a tree and dead, the people of the country explained that she had been unable to keep up with the other slaves in a gang, and her master had determined that she should not become the property of anyone else if she recovered after resting a time. . . . we saw others tied up in a similar manner . . . the Arab who owned these victims was enraged at losing his money by the slaves becoming unable to march, and vented his spleen by murdering them” (p. 56). “The Life and African Explorations of Dr. David Livingstone” (St. Louis, 1874).


After the fall of Saddam Huessin media finally could report on what it is like to live in a Muslim Arab Middle Eastern country for black people, and here is something that most black people don’t know much about.
There is severe racism and racist attitudes towards black folk by Arabs. In fact, the racism against blacks remain from the Arab slave trade when 140 million Africans were captured, sold, and exported by Muslims. It is Muslims who created the expansive export of slaves in collaboration with local African Kings. The massive wealth they accumulated from it, attracted the rest of the world to part take in the slave industry many centuries later.
Arabs had been exporting and selling slaves for more than 1000 years before others caught on. Even today, in 2013, Muslims enslave over 27 million blacks throughout Africa, and parts of the Middle East. Slavery is legal according to Quran’s sharia law as the prophet also enslaved, raped and killed blacks. Muslims engage in slavery of other people as well, but especially enslavement of blacks who are considered sub-human by Arabs. A few months ago we posted an image from an ad in Arabic where a Saudi offered a “castrated black African” for sale he had purchased when the slave was a child. In Sudan Muslims sell child slaves for around US$10 to other Muslims (today’s market rate).
[note: the “white people” referred to in the video are Arabs, not caucasians. Muslims refer to blacks as “Abd/Abid” – slave – even to this day]